Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of patient characteristics between the failure and non-failure groups

From: Mid-term results and factors affecting outcome of a metal-backed unicompartmental knee design: a case series

 

Failure

Non-failure

 

Hazard Ratio

Variables

(N = 9)

(N = 71)

P value a

Ratio

95% CI

Mean age (years)

61 [8]

74 [9]

< 0.01

0.94

0.86-1.03

Male gender (percent)

44

42

1.00

0.30

0.05-1.87

Mean body mass index (kg/m2)

28 [7]

27 [4]

0.71

-

-

Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) (percent)

44

20

0.11

2.13

0.34-13.3

Diagnosis (percent)

   

-

-

   Osteoarthritis

100

85

0.35

-

-

   Osteonecrosis

0

15

 

0.00

0.00

Mean pre-op objective score (points)

53 [10]

49 [9]

0.21

1.01

0.92-1.11

Mean pre-op functional score (points)

51 [5]

47 [10]

0.30

1.07

0.96-1.19

Pre-op patellar osteophytes (percent of patients)

33

46

0.38

0.27

0.07-2.01

  1. CI = confidence interval
  2. a p values were calculated based on Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables, and chi-squared or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables.