Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Potential impact of publication bias for all outcomes

From: Intramedullary nail fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of adult diaphyseal forearm fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

Potential Publication Bias Impact

Comment

Operative time

Minimal

The effect size remains significant after adjustment, suggesting limited influence of bias on observed heterogeneity

Complications

Moderate

Initial findings may have been overestimated due to bias, as indicated by the non-significant effect after adjustment

Surgical site infection

Moderate

Initial effect size was influenced by bias, but the result remained non-significant after adjustment

Implant removal

Minimal

The significant effect persists even after adjusting for bias, indicating limited effect of bias on results

Time-To-Union

Minimal

Bias had little impact on the non-significant result

Nonunion Rates

Minimal

Publication bias does not substantially affect the non-significant result

DASH scores

Minimal

Publication bias does not substantially affect the non-significant result

Grace–Eversmann scores

Moderate

Initial significant effect was influenced by bias, with adjustment showing a non-significant effect