Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Fig. 7 | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Fig. 7

From: Improved primary stability and load transfer of a customized osseointegrated transfemoral prosthesis compared to a commercial one

Fig. 7

Comparison of the strain distribution in ROI 1 (top charts) and ROI2 (bottom). The maximum principal strain (ε1, charts on the left) and minimum principal strain (ε2, on the right) were analyzed for the commercial and the contralateral OsteoCustom implants. For each group, the individual specimens (small circles), the median (horizontal line), the 25–75% percentile (solid box), and the 5th and 95th percentile (whiskers) are indicated. No statistically significant differences were found between the commercial and the customized stem (p > 0.05)

Back to article page

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X