Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of CS rate and fusion rate between two groups

From: Is lumbar spondylolisthesis a risk factor of cage subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral screw fixation?

 

DLS

(n = 92)

DLSS

(n = 92)

p

CS (n)

  

< 0.05*

 None

64

77

 

 CS

28(30.43%)

15(16.30%)

 

Fusion (n)

  

> 0.999

 None

2

1

 

 Fusion

90(97.83%)

91(98.91%)

 
  1. CS, cage subsidence; n, number of patients
  2. * statistical significance between two groups