Skip to main content

Table 2 Critical appraisal results of eligible systematic reviews

From: Spatiotemporal and kinematic gait changes in flexible flatfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Total

Houck et al. [39]

Y

Y

U

Y

N

N

Y

Y

5

Levinger et al. [42]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

7

Shih et al. [29]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

7

Twomey & mcintosh. [27]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

7

Ho¨sl et al. [36]

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

U

5

Buldt et al. [26]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

7

Prachgosin et al. [40]

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

6

Zhang et al. [24]

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

6

Kerr et al. [17]

Y

Y

Y

U

N

N

Y

Y

5

Shin et al. [37]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

7

Dodelin et al. [25]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

7

Alahmri et al. [28]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

7

Marouvo et al. [20]

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

6

Kim et al. [38]

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

N

Y

Y

6

Son et al. [41]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

7

Vijittrakarnrung et al. [43]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

7

  1. JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses: Q1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? Q2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? Q3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Q4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? Q5. Were confounding factors identified? Q6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? Q7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? Q8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?