Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the included studies

From: Outcomes of dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty for patients with femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis including registry data

Author and year

Study design

Group

Female

Mean follow-up(months)

Sample size

Mean age (years)

Cup fixation

Posterior approach

Hardinge approach

Achudan, 2022

Retrospective Cohort

DM

91

24,1

42

68

Uncemented

129

0

THA

42,7

87

70,9

Agarwala, 2021

Prospective Cohort

DM

53

12

52

75,5

Mixed cases (uncemented/ cemented)

0

103

THA

51

73,3

Cnudde, 2022

Retrospective Cohort

DM

102

12

172

77,9

MD

103

69

THA

379

605

72,3

262

372

Alberio, 2021

Retrospective Cohort

DM

42

23

24

77

Uncemented

48

0

THA

24

78,3

Griffin, 2016

RCT

DM

MD

12

9

N/A

Uncemented

MD

MD

THA

10

Hoggett, 2023

Retrospective Cohort

DM

MD

41

106

76

Cemented

102

4

THA

42

189

73

140

49

Hoskins, 2021

Retrospective Cohort

DM

1265

24

1778

75

MD

MD

MD

THA

7123

40

8582

73

Parhamfar, 2023

RCT

DM

42

18

40

63

MD

0

84

THA

44

64

Rashed, 2020

RCT

DM

32

12

31

66,3

Cemented

62

0

THA

31

68

Rashed, 2020

Retrospective Cohort

DM

240

12

223

72,3

MD

334

0

THA

111

72,1

Rogmark, 2022

Retrospective Cohort

DM

1374

60

2242

76

Mixed cases (uncemented/ cemented)

1114

4234

1128

THA

4120

6726

75,2

2492

Sadozai, 2021

Retrospective Cohort

DM

MD

37

127

N/A

Mixed cases (uncemented/ cemented)

MD

MD

THA

195

Tarasevicius, 2013

Prospective Cohort

DM

61

12

41

75

Cemented

84

0

THA

43

76

  1. RCT, randomized clinical trial; DM, dual mobility; THA, total hip arthroplasty; MD, missing data