Skip to main content

Table 1 Study and patient characteristics

From: “Anatomic patella design versus medialized dome design in the modern posterior stabilized (ATTUNE) total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis”

Study, Year

Study Design / LoE

Total Cases

(women %)

Knees (APD / MDD)

Mean Age (APD / MDD)

Mean BMI (APD / MDD)

Tibial Bearing Design

Ahearn 2021 [11]

prospective cohort/II

100 (63)

50/50

71/69

31.2/31.7

-

Kleeman-Forsthuber 2024 [8]

retrospective cohort/III

200 (70)

100/100

66/66

26.2/26.2

MB

Mannen 2019 [12]

retrospective cohort/III

27 (69)

16/16

62.5/65.2

25.6/27.6

MB

Mochizuki 2021 [10]

RCT/I

48 (93)

24/24

74.3/73.0

27.1/28.1

FB

Shon 2022 [7]

RCT/I

98 (90)

49/49

71.33/71.92

27.69/27.11

FB

Sobhi 2024 [5]

prospective cohort/II

505 (-)

212/323

67.85/66.9

30.63/31.23

MB

Kim 2023 [9]

RCT/I

91 (86)

47/44

69.36/70.62

26.73/26.87

FB

Total

3 RCT/4 Cohort

1069 (86)

507/606

68.5/67.5

28.7/28.95

 
  1. APD Anatomic patellar design, MDD Medialized dome design, RCT Randomized controlled trial, LoE Level of evidence, BMI Body mass index, FB Fixed bearing, MB Mobile bearing