Table 2 Chondral defect characteristics of included studies
Author | Year | Procedure | Mean Lesion Size cm2 ± SD (Range) | Acetabular, n (%) | Femoral head, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schroeder et al [41] | 2016 | ACT | 5.05 (2–6) | 21 (100) | 0 (0) |
Krueger et al [42] | 2021 | ACT | 5.0 (2–6) | 36 (100) | 0 (0) |
Bretschneider et al [39] | 2019 | ACT | 3 ± 1.4 | 19 (90.5) | 2 (9.5) |
Thier et al [43] | 2017 | ACT | 2.21 | 29 (100) | 0 (0) |
Krueger et al [44] | 2018 | ACT | 4.9 (2–6) | 32 (100) | 0 (0) |
Mancini, Fontana [32] | 2014 | ACT | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 26 (100) | 0 (0) |
AMIC | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 31 (100) | 0 (0) | ||
Briem et al [45] | 2024 | AMIC | Acetabulum 2.9 ± 0.6 | 8 (66.7) | 4 (33.3) |
Femoral head 2.3 ± 0.6 | |||||
Thorey et al [46] | 2020 | AMIC | 3.2 ± 0.9 | 62 (100) | 0 (0) |
de Girolamo et al [47] | 2018 | AMIC | 3.5 (2–8) | 59 (100) | 0 (0) |
Villarrubia et al [48] | 2022 | AMIC | 3 (2–4) | 28 (100) | 0 (0) |
Fontana [49] | 2016 | AMIC | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 201 (100) | 0 (0) |
Fontana and de Girolamo [50] | 2015 | AMIC | 3.5 (2–8) | 70 (100) | 0 (0) |