Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of included studies

From: MAKO robotic-assisted compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year of Study

Title

Study Design - Prospective or Retrospective or RCT

Study Location

LaValva et al. [38]

2024

Robotics and Navigation do not affect the risk of periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip arthroplasty

Retrospective

USA

Rogers et al. [47]

2024

Lower 90-day inpatient readmission and 1-year reoperation in patients undergoing robotic versus manual total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach

Prospective

USA

Karlin et al. [30]

2024

Patient Outcomes of Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

Retrospectively

USA

Fontalis et al. [19]

2024

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing CT-based Planning with Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Robotic Arm-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

Prospective RCT

UK

Alessia-Mazzola et al. [2]

2024

Direct anterior approach with conventional instruments versus robotic posterolateral approach in elective total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a case–control study

Retrospective

Italy

Fontalis et al. [18]

2023

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Conventional Total HipArthroplasty Versus Robotic-Arm Assisted Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study With Minimum 3 Years’ Follow-Up

Prospective

UK

Foissey et al. [17]

2022

Image‑based robotic‑assisted total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach allows a better orientation of the acetabular cup and a better restitution of the centre of rotation than a conventional procedure

Retrospective

France

Coulomb et al. [12]

2023

Does acetabular robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty with femoral navigation improve clinical outcomes at 1-year post-operative? A case-matched propensity score study comparing 98 robotic-assisted versus 98 manual implantation hip arthroplasties

Retrospective

France

Domb et al. [14]

2020

Minimum 5-Year Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Nested Comparison Against Manual Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

Retrospective

USA

Peng et al. [44]

2019

In vivo kinematic analysis of patients with robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty during gait at 1‐year follow‐up

Retrospective

USA

Kayani et al. [34]

2019

The learning curve of robotic-arm assisted acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty

Prospective

UK

Kayani et al. (2) [52]

2019

Assuring the Long-Term Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Triad of Variables

Prospective

UK

Heng et al. [23]

2018

Conventional vs. Robotic Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Time, Transfusion Rates, Length of Stay, Complications and Learning Curve

Retrospective

Australia

Suarez Ahedo et al [55]

2017

Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Results in Smaller Acetabular Cup Size in Relation to the Femoral Head Size: A matched-pair controlled study

Retrospective

USA

Tsai et al. [54]

2016

Does haptic robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty better restore native

acetabular and femoral anatomy?

Retrospective

USA

El Bitar et al. [16]

2015

Leg-Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Robot-Assisted, Posterior, Fluoroscopy-Guided Anterior, and Conventional Posterior Approaches

Retrospective

USA

Perets et al. [45]

2021

Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Pair Matched Controlled Study

Prospective

USA

Incesoy et al [27]

2023

CT-based, Robotic Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty (MAKO) through anterior approach provides improved cup placement accuracy but no difference in clinical outcomes when compared to conventional technique

Retrospective

Turkey

Nicholas D Clement et al. [11]

2021

Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty

Prospective

Scotland

Banchetti et al. [3]

2018

Comparison of conventional versus robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty using the Mako system: An Italian retrospective study

Retrospective

Italy