Skip to main content

Table 2 Rationale for the surgical approach by study

From: Posterior Fixation and Fusion (PFF) versus Combined Anterior and Posterior Fixation and Fusion (CAPFF) for type B and C thoracolumbar spine injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Study Design

Rationale for Approach

Zheng 2013 [16]

RCS

Not reported (Retrospectively found patients with either intervention)

Been 1999 [13]

RCS

Surgeon’s determination based on instrumentation availability and the presence of other severe organ injuries

Danisa 1995 [14]

RCS

Surgeon’s determination

Defino 2007 [20]

RCS

Determined by vertebral body involvement. Intact vertebral body received posterior approach; fractured vertebral body received CAPFF

Gumussuyu 2019 [15]

RCT

Randomly by “flipping a coin"

Lukas 2007 [17]

PCS

B or C type fractures with Load-Sharing Classification (LSC) ≥ 6 received CAPFF. B or C fractures with LSC ≤ 6 received PFF

Muratore 2021 [18]

RCS

Determined on a case-by-case basis accounting for the anatomical and general situation of each patient

Wang 2015 [19]

RCT

Randomization via computer-generated sequence