Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Knee morphology and patella malalignment in neglected developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Groups

Subjects

Legs

Male/Female

Age, years

Bilateral DDH

DDH system

DDH-type

Occasional AKP, %

MINORS (R1/R2)

Kandemir 2002 [3]

DDH

34

44

2/32

44.2 (17–68)

10

Crowe system

16 type III-IV, 12 type I-II, 6 hypoplasia

7/34, 21%

21/21

 

Control

10

20

1/9

38.9 (18–58)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

AkÅŸahin 2012 [10]

DDH

39

53

6/33

33.3 ± 7.9

14

Crowe system

8 type I, 10type II, 12 type III, 23 type IV

39/39, 100%

22/22

 

Control

24

48

4/20

31.5 ± 8.5

    

NA

Li 2013 [17]

DDH

75

114

NA

56 (23–78)

39

Hartofilakidis

64 type I, 2 type II, 8 type III

NA

22/21

 

Control

36

36

NA

56 (23–78)

NA

NA

NA

 

NA

Li 2014 [16]

DDH

37

74

2/35

32.6 ± 8.1

14

Crowe system

5 type I, type II, type III, 4 type IV

7/37, 16.2%

22/22

 

Control

37

74

2/35

32.3 ± 7.7

NA

NA

NA

 

NA

Imai 2018 [7]

DDH

29

29

0/29

35.8 8.8

NA

Crowe system

Type I subluxation

NA

21/21

 

Control

48

48

0/48

54 10.8

    

NA

Hu 2019 [8]

DDH

116

196

19/97

21.6 ± 6.7

NA

LCE + FAA

116 (LCE < 20°+FAA < 40°), 80 (LCE < 20°+FAA > 40°)

NA

22/23

 

Control

22

34

4/18

23.2 ± 6.8

NA

LCE + FAA

LCE > 20° and FAA < 40°

 

NA

Imai 2019 [6]

DDH

73

146

0/73

35.6 ± 9

73

Crowe system

Type II-IV subluxation

NA

21/22

 

Control

45

90

0/45

49 ± 18.9

NA

NA

NA

 

NA

Peng 2022 [18]

DDH

70

86

18/52

27.1 ± 9.9

16

Hartofilakidis

Type I subluxation

6/70, 8.6%

21/22

 

Control

33

33

15/18

35 ± 9.4

NA

NA

NA

 

NA

Fithian 2023 [19]

DDH

48

48

5/43

31.9 ± 8.4

NA

Hartofilakidis

Type I subluxation

8/48, 17%

21/21

 

Control

48

48

5/43

30.6 ± 11.6

NA

NA

NA

 

NA

  1. DDH, developmental dysplasia of the hip; AKP, anterior knee pain; LCE, lateral center-edge angle; FAA, femoral anteversion angle; NA, not available